Switch to: References

Citations of:

Introduction to Bayes's Theorem

In E. Eells (ed.), Bayes's Theorem. Oxford University Press (2008)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Mark Steiner: The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem. [REVIEW]Rinat Nugayev - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):628-631.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Foundations of Skeptical Theism.Stephen J. Wykstra & Timothy Perrine - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (4):375-399.
    Some skeptical theists use Wykstra’s CORNEA constraint to undercut Rowe-style inductive arguments from evil. Many critics of skeptical theism accept CORNEA, but argue that Rowe-style arguments meet its constraint. But Justin McBrayer argues that CORNEA is itself mistaken. It is, he claims, akin to “sensitivity” or “truth-tracking” constraints like those of Robert Nozick; but counterexamples show that inductive evidence is often insensitive. We here defend CORNEA against McBrayer’s chief counterexample. We first clarify CORNEA, distinguishing it from a deeper underlying principle (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Two dogmas of strong objective bayesianism.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
    We introduce a distinction, unnoticed in the literature, between four varieties of objective Bayesianism. What we call ' strong objective Bayesianism' is characterized by two claims, that all scientific inference is 'logical' and that, given the same background information two agents will ascribe a unique probability to their priors. We think that neither of these claims can be sustained; in this sense, they are 'dogmatic'. The first fails to recognize that some scientific inference, in particular that concerning evidential relations, is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Book ReviewJoke Meheus , Inconsistency in Science. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers , x + 222 pp., $74.00. [REVIEW]Peter Quigley - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):637-639.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Book ReviewLorenzo Magnani, Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers , xvii + 205pp., $85.00. [REVIEW]Cameron Shelley - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):639-643.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Book ReviewThomas Metzinger, Being No One: The Self‐Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press , xiv + 699 pp., $ 55.00. [REVIEW]Reiner Hedrich - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):634-637.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Book ReviewDavid Howie, Interpreting Probability: Controversies and Developments in the Early Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , xi + 262 pp., $60.00 cloth. [REVIEW]Branden Fitelson - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):643-646.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark