The Foundations of Skeptical Theism

Faith and Philosophy 29 (4):375-399 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some skeptical theists use Wykstra’s CORNEA constraint to undercut Rowe-style inductive arguments from evil. Many critics of skeptical theism accept CORNEA, but argue that Rowe-style arguments meet its constraint. But Justin McBrayer argues that CORNEA is itself mistaken. It is, he claims, akin to “sensitivity” or “truth-tracking” constraints like those of Robert Nozick; but counterexamples show that inductive evidence is often insensitive. We here defend CORNEA against McBrayer’s chief counterexample. We first clarify CORNEA, distinguishing it from a deeper underlying principle that we dub “CORE.” We then give both principles a probabilistic construal, and show how, on this construal, the counterexample fails
ISBN(s)
0739-7046
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WYKTFO
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Indicative Conditionals.Stalnaker, Robert

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Evil and Evidence.Benton, Matthew A.; Hawthorne, John & Isaacs, Yoaav
Skeptical Theism.Perrine, Timothy & Wykstra, Stephen

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-12-27

Total views
662 ( #4,756 of 46,167 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
114 ( #4,997 of 46,167 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.