Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Transcending “transcending…”.Stephen Jośe Hanson - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (4):656-657.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Normative, descriptive and prescriptive responses.Jonathan Baron - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):32-42.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Goals, values and benefits.Frederic Schick - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):29-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What goals are to count?Mark D. Spranca - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):29-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The consequences of taking consequentialism seriously.Philip E. Tetlock - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):31-32.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On begging the question when naturalizing norms.Leonard D. Katz - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):21-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Jonathan Baron, consequentialism and error theory.Sanford S. Levy - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):22-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consequentialism in haste.Roger A. McCain - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):23-24.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Does consequentialism pay?Adam Morton - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):24-24.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Side effects: Limitations of human rationality.Keith Oatley - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):24-25.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Some examples of nonconsequentialist decisions.Gerald M. Phillips - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):25-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A “should” too many.Paul M. Pietroski - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):26-27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Broadening the base for bringing cognitive psychology to bear on ethics.Peter Railton - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):27-28.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Truth or consequences.John Heil - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):19-20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Elicitation rules and incompatible goals.Julie R. Irwin - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):20-21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Departing from consequentialism versus departing from decision theory.Frank Jackson - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):21-21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Correct decisions and their good consequences.Steven Daniel - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):13-14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why care where moral intuitions come from?Susan Dwyer - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):14-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Normative and descriptive consequentialism.Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):15-16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consequentialism and utility theory.Deborah Frisch - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):16-16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is consequentialism better regarded as a form of reasoning or as a pattern of behavior?Steve Fuller - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):16-17.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moral errors.Clark Glymour - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):17-18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consequences of consequentialism.Rick Grush - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):18-19.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Fairness to policies, distinctions and intuitions.Jonathan E. Adler - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):10-11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Three reservations about consequentialism.Hal R. Arkes - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):11-12.
    According to a simple form of consequentialism, we should base decision on our judgments about their consequences for achieving out goals. Our goals give us reason to endorse consequentialism as a standard of decision making. Alternative standards invariably lead to consequences that are less good in this sense. Yet some people knowingly follow decision rules that violate consequentialism. For example, they prefer harmful omissions to less harmful acts, they favor the status quo over alternatives they would otherwise judge to be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Inappropriate judgements: Slips, mistakes or violations?Peter Ayton & Nigel Harvey - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):12-12.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Do, or should, all human decisions conform to the norms of a consumer-oriented culture?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):12-13.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nonconsequentialist decisions.Jonathan Baron - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):1-10. Translated by Jonathan Baron.
    According to a simple form of consequentialism, we should base decisions on our judgments about their consequences for achieving our goals. Our goals give us reason to endorse consequentialism as a standard of decision making. Alternative standards invariably lead to consequences that are less good in this sense. Yet some people knowingly follow decision rules that violate consequentialism. For example, they prefer harmful omissions to less harmful acts, they favor the status quo over alternatives they would otherwise judge to be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  • Reviews. [REVIEW]J. St B. T. Evans, Keith Watson, Robin Pedley, Michael Paffard, Kenneth Charlton, Jack Sislian, Michael Heafford, T. R. Bone, J. R. B. Mcminn, R. W. Davies, Robin Barrow, Douglas Quadling, F. R. Watson, Christine Wilkik, Frank Myszor, Viv Edwards & P. E. Fordham - 1987 - British Journal of Educational Studies 35 (1):74-97.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Irrationality Re-Examined: A Few Comments on the Conjunction Fallacy.Michael Aristidou - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):329-336.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Free Will and Advances in Cognitive Science.Leonid Perlovsky - 2012 - Open Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):32-37.
    Freedom of will is fundamental to morality, intuition of self, and normal functioning of society. However, science does not provide a clear logical foundation for this idea. This paper considers the fundamental argument against free will, so called reductionism, and why the choice for dualism against monism, follows logically. Then, the paper summarizes unexpected conclusions from recent discoveries in cognitive science. Classical logic turns out not to be a fundamental mechanism of the mind. It is replaced by dynamic logic. Mathematical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: A meta-analytic review.Amanda D. Angie, Shane Connelly, Ethan P. Waples & Vykinta Kligyte - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (8):1393-1422.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory.P. N. Johnson-Laird & Keith Oatley - 1992 - Cognition and Emotion 6 (3-4):201-223.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • An information processing analysis of the emotional disorders.Ian H. Gotlib - 1990 - Cognition and Emotion 4 (1):53-60.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Causal Organisation of Emotional Knowledge: A Developmental Study.Nancy L. Stein & Linda J. Levine - 1989 - Cognition and Emotion 3 (4):343-378.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Individualno odlučivanje, grupno odlučivanje i deliberacija.Bojana Radovanović - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):147-167.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Relatively certain! Comparative thinking reduces uncertainty.Thomas Mussweiler & Ann-Christin Posten - 2012 - Cognition 122 (2):236-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The role of intuition and deliberative thinking in experts’ superior tactical decision-making.Jerad H. Moxley, K. Anders Ericsson, Neil Charness & Ralf T. Krampe - 2012 - Cognition 124 (1):72-78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Cuatro problemas teóricos fundamentales para una democracia deliberativa.José Manuel Robles - 2011 - Polis (Misc) 7 (1):45-67.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Manipulating number generation: Loud+ long= large?Alexander Heinemann, Roland Pfister & Markus Janczyk - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (4):1332-1339.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Language-guided visual processing affects reasoning: The role of referential and spatial anchoring.Magda L. Dumitru, Gitte H. Joergensen, Alice G. Cruickshank & Gerry T. M. Altmann - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (2):562-571.
    Language is more than a source of information for accessing higher-order conceptual knowledge. Indeed, language may determine how people perceive and interpret visual stimuli. Visual processing in linguistic contexts, for instance, mirrors language processing and happens incrementally, rather than through variously-oriented fixations over a particular scene. The consequences of this atypical visual processing are yet to be determined. Here, we investigated the integration of visual and linguistic input during a reasoning task. Participants listened to sentences containing conjunctions or disjunctions and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Fooled by the brain: re-examining the influence of neuroimages.N. J. Schweitzer, D. A. Baker & Evan F. Risko - 2013 - Cognition 129 (3):501-511.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Problems of transparent medical risk communication using the example of mammography screening—an ethical perspective.Christof Breitsameter - 2011 - Ethik in der Medizin 23 (3):191-200.
    Die spezifischen Anforderungen riskanter Entscheidungslagen stellen die Medizinethik zunehmend vor die Herausforderung, normative Modelle der Risikokommunikation zu etablieren. Dabei geht es freilich nicht nur darum, Informationen über die Wahrscheinlichkeiten, mit denen bestimmte Ereignisse eintreten, bereitzustellen. Zur medizinischen Aufklärung gehört auch, dass Risiken verständlich kommuniziert werden. Andernfalls würde ein Patient zwar über Informationen verfügen, wäre aber nicht in der Lage, sie richtig zu interpretieren und zu bewerten. Der Beitrag stellt am Beispiel von Mammographie-Screenings Probleme der transparenten Kommunikation medizinischer Risiken dar. Diese (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A graphical representation of uncertainty in complex decision making.Fabio Boschetti - 2011 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 13:146-168.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Consequence of Principle.William Flynn - 2001 - Education and Culture 17 (2):4.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Probability versus inductive confirmation.Katya Tentori, Vincenzo Crupi & Selena Russo - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (1):235.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Heuristika sidrenja.Marko Bokulić & Darko Polšek - 2010 - Prolegomena 9 (1):71-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Does the Mind Work? Insights from Biology.Gary Marcus - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1):145-172.
    Cognitive scientists must understand not just what the mind does, but how it does what it does. In this paper, I consider four aspects of cognitive architecture: how the mind develops, the extent to which it is or is not modular, the extent to which it is or is not optimal, and the extent to which it should or should not be considered a symbol‐manipulating device (as opposed to, say, an eliminative connectionist network). In each case, I argue that insights (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Nonbinding recommendations: the relative effects of focal points versus uncertainty reduction on bargaining outcomes. [REVIEW]David L. Dickinson & Lynn Hunnicutt - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (4):615-634.
    This article focuses on the effects of nonbinding recommendations on bargaining outcomes. Recommendations are theorized to have two effects: they can create a focal point for final bargaining positions, and they can decrease outcome uncertainty should dispute persist. While the focal point effect may lower dispute rates, the uncertainty reduction effect is predicted to do the opposite for risk-averse bargainers. Which of these effects dominates is of critical importance in the design of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, which are increasingly (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Loss Aversion in Bimatrix Games.Bram Driesen, Andrés Perea & Hans Peters - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (4):367-391.
    In this article three different types of loss aversion equilibria in bimatrix games are studied. Loss aversion equilibria are Nash equilibria of games where players are loss averse and where the reference points—points below which they consider payoffs to be losses—are endogenous to the equilibrium calculation. The first type is the fixed point loss aversion equilibrium, introduced in Shalev (2000; Int. J. Game Theory 29(2):269) under the name of ‘myopic loss aversion equilibrium.’ There, the players’ reference points depend on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations