Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. PROOF THEORY. Gödel and the metamathematical tradition.Jeremy Avigad - 2010 - In Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.), Kurt Gödel: essays for his centennial. Ithaca, NY: Association for Symbolic Logic.
    At the turn of the nineteenth century, mathematics exhibited a style of argumentation that was more explicitly computational than is common today. Over the course of the century, the introduction of abstract algebraic methods helped unify developments in analysis, number theory, geometry, and the theory of equations; and work by mathematicians like Dedekind, Cantor, and Hilbert towards the end of the century introduced set-theoretic language and infinitary methods that served to downplay or suppress computational content. This shift in emphasis away (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Towards NP – P via proof complexity and search.Samuel R. Buss - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (7):906-917.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • From Truth Degree Comparison Games to Sequents-of-Relations Calculi for Gödel Logic.Christian Fermüller, Timo Lang & Alexandra Pavlova - 2022 - Logica Universalis 16 (1):221-235.
    We introduce a game for Gödel logic where the players’ interaction stepwise reduces claims about the relative order of truth degrees of complex formulas to atomic truth comparison claims. Using the concept of disjunctive game states this semantic game is lifted to a provability game, where winning strategies correspond to proofs in a sequents-of-relations calculus.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Computational Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Mathematics†.Walter Dean - 2019 - Philosophia Mathematica 27 (3):381-439.
    Computational complexity theory is a subfield of computer science originating in computability theory and the study of algorithms for solving practical mathematical problems. Amongst its aims is classifying problems by their degree of difficulty — i.e., how hard they are to solve computationally. This paper highlights the significance of complexity theory relative to questions traditionally asked by philosophers of mathematics while also attempting to isolate some new ones — e.g., about the notion of feasibility in mathematics, the $\mathbf{P} \neq \mathbf{NP}$ (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reasoning about knowledge in linear logic: modalities and complexity.Mathieu Marion & Mehrnouche Sadrzadeh - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 327--350.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Sentential Logic for Psychologists.Richard Grandy & Daniel Osherson - unknown
    Students often study logic on the assumption that it provides a normative guide to reasoning in English. In particular, they are taught to associate connectives like “and” with counterparts in Sentential Logic. English conditionals go over to formulas with → as principal connective. The well-known difficulties that arise from such translation are not emphasized. The result is the conviction that ordinary reasoning is faulty when discordant with the usual representation in standard logic. Psychologists are particularly susceptible to this attitude.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The proof complexity of linear algebra.Michael Soltys & Stephen Cook - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 130 (1-3):277-323.
    We introduce three formal theories of increasing strength for linear algebra in order to study the complexity of the concepts needed to prove the basic theorems of the subject. We give what is apparently the first feasible proofs of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem and other properties of the determinant, and study the propositional proof complexity of matrix identities such as AB=I→BA=I.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency.Paul E. Dunne & T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 149 (2):221-250.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Normality, Non-contamination and Logical Depth in Classical Natural Deduction.Marcello D’Agostino, Dov Gabbay & Sanjay Modgil - 2020 - Studia Logica 108 (2):291-357.
    In this paper we provide a detailed proof-theoretical analysis of a natural deduction system for classical propositional logic that (i) represents classical proofs in a more natural way than standard Gentzen-style natural deduction, (ii) admits of a simple normalization procedure such that normal proofs enjoy the Weak Subformula Property, (iii) provides the means to prove a Non-contamination Property of normal proofs that is not satisfied by normal proofs in the Gentzen tradition and is useful for applications, especially in formal argumentation, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Depth of Resolution Proofs.Alasdair Urquhart - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):349-364.
    This paper investigates the depth of resolution proofs, that is to say, the length of the longest path in the proof from an input clause to the conclusion. An abstract characterization of the measure is given, as well as a discussion of its relation to other measures of space complexity for resolution proofs.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Partially definable forcing and bounded arithmetic.Albert Atserias & Moritz Müller - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (1):1-33.
    We describe a method of forcing against weak theories of arithmetic and its applications in propositional proof complexity.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Automatic proof generation in an axiomatic system for $\mathsf{CPL}$ by means of the method of Socratic proofs.Aleksandra Grzelak & Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion - 2018 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 26 (1):109-148.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On the correspondence between arithmetic theories and propositional proof systems – a survey.Olaf Beyersdorff - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (2):116-137.
    The purpose of this paper is to survey the correspondence between bounded arithmetic and propositional proof systems. In addition, it also contains some new results which have appeared as an extended abstract in the proceedings of the conference TAMC 2008 [11].Bounded arithmetic is closely related to propositional proof systems; this relation has found many fruitful applications. The aim of this paper is to explain and develop the general correspondence between propositional proof systems and arithmetic theories, as introduced by Krajíček and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints.Paul E. Dunne - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):701-729.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • EXPtime tableaux for ALC.Francesco M. Donini & Fabio Massacci - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence 124 (1):87-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations