Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Heidegger and the romantics: the literary invention of meaning.Pol Vandevelde - 2012 - New York: Routledge.
    <P>While there are many books on the romantics, and many books on Heidegger, there has been no book exploring the connection between the two. Pol Vandevelde’s new study forges this important link. </P> <P>Vandevelde begins by analyzing two models that have addressed the interaction between literature and philosophy: early German romanticism (especially Schlegel and Novalis), and Heidegger’s work with poetry in the 1930s. Both models offer an alternative to the paradigm of mimesis, as exemplified by Aristotle’s and Plato’s discussion of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Fictions, feelings, and emotions.Stuart Brock - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (2):211 - 242.
    Many philosophers suggest (1) that our emotional engagement with fiction involves participation in a game of make-believe, and (2) that what distinguishes an emotional game from a dispassionate game is the fact that the former activity alone involves sensations of physiological and visceral disturbances caused by our participation in the game. In this paper I argue that philosophers who accept (1) should reject (2). I then illustrate how this conclusion illuminates various puzzles in aesthetics and the philosophy of mind.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Fiction.Fred Kroon - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The Rationality of Emotion toward Fiction.Seahwa Kim - 2010 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1):106-119.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Real Puzzle From Radford.Seahwa Kim - 2005 - Erkenntnis 62 (1):29-46.
    In this paper, I will argue that Radfords real question is not the conceptual one, as it is usually taken, but the causal one, and show that Waltons account, which treats Radfords puzzle as the conceptual question, is not a satisfactory solution to it. I will also argue that contrary to what Walton claims, the causal question is not only important, but also closely related to the conceptual and normative questions. What matters is not that Walton has not solved Radfords (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Fiction and Emotion: The Puzzle of Divergent Norms.Stacie Friend - 2020 - British Journal of Aesthetics 60 (4):403-418.
    A familiar question in the literature on emotional responses to fiction, originally put forward by Colin Radford, is how such responses can be rational. How can we make sense of pitying Anna Karenina when we know there is no such person? In this paper I argue that contrary to the usual interpretation, the question of rationality has nothing to do with the Paradox of Fiction. Instead, the real problem is why there is a divergence in our normative assessments of emotions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Rationality of Emotion toward Fiction.K. I. M. Seahwa - 2010 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1):106-119.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark