Through the Eyes of Mad Men: Simulation, Interaction, and Ethics

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Traditionally pragmatists have been favorably disposed to improving our understanding of agency and ethics through the use of empirical research. In the last two decades simulation theory has been championed in certain cognitive science circles as a way of explaining how we attribute mental states and predict human behavior. Drawing on research in psychology and neuroscience, Alvin I. Goldman and Robert M. Gordon have not only used simulation theory to discuss how we “mindread”, but have suggested that the theory has implications for ethics. The limitations of simulation theory for “mindreading” and ethics are addressed in this article from an interactionist or neo-Meadian pragmatic perspective. To demonstrate the limitations of simulation theory scenes from the television show Mad Men are used as “thought-experiments”.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-08-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Imagination in Action.Dorstewitz, Philipp

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
218 ( #20,088 of 50,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #30,569 of 50,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.