Nonideal Justice as Nonideal Fairness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article argues that diverse theorists have reasons to theorize about fairness in nonideal conditions, including theorists who reject fairness in ideal theory. It then develops a new all-purpose model of ‘nonideal fairness.’ §1 argues that fairness is central to nonideal theory across diverse ideological and methodological frameworks. §2 then argues that ‘nonideal fairness’ is best modeled by a nonideal original position adaptable to different nonideal conditions and background normative frameworks (including anti-Rawlsian ones). §3 then argues that the parties to the model have grounds to seek a variety of remedial social, legal, cultural, and economic ‘nonideal primary goods’ for combating injustice, as well as grounds to distribute these goods in an equitable and inclusive manner. Finally, I illustrate how the model indexes the nonideal primary goods it justifies to different nonideal contexts and background normative frameworks, illustrating why diverse theorists should find the model and its output principles attractive.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARVNJA-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-11-01
Latest version: 2 (2019-03-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-11-01

Total views
317 ( #13,754 of 48,898 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #9,105 of 48,898 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.