The Aborted Object of Comedy and the Birth of the Subject: Plato and Aristophanes’ Alliance

In The Object of Comedy: Philosophies and Performances. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 75-92 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I set the stage for Socrates and Aristophanes’ alliance by beginning with Hegel’s question, what is the object of art?, in the context of his analysis of ancient Greek “art-religion.” Hegel traces the shifting object of art through a variety of artistic practices before arriving at comedy, which he identifies as the last stage of Greek aesthetic life. He finally asks, what is the object of comedy? Unlike other artistic practices that are positively defined by their created object or creative activity, ancient comedy appears to be purely destructive, terminating anything that might be traditionally recognizable as an object of art. Hegel points to Aristophanes and Socrates as representing two sides of the defacement of the object of art-religion as such. Moving beyond Hegel, I turn to Aristophanes and Plato to consider how in the performative destruction of the object of aesthetic and philo- sophical reflection, something slips into being that may be identified as the phantom form of the Subject.

Author's Profile

Rachel Aumiller
Columbia University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-10

Downloads
115 (#85,341)

6 months
96 (#45,255)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?