Between Critical and Normative Theory

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Over the last decade, a call for greater “realism” in political theory has challenged the goals and methods that are implicit in much contemporary “normative” theory. However, realists have yet to produce a convincing alternative research program that is “constructive” rather than primarily “critical” in nature. I argue that given their common wariness of a devotion to abstract principles, realists should consider adopting John Dewey’s vision of theoretical expertise as an expansive kind of prediction that engages all of our historical, scientific, and imaginative resources. After demonstrating that realists are in need of such an affirmative vision, I outline Dewey’s original proposal, and elaborate its value in contemporary circumstances as a “predictive” method for political theory that stands between familiar critical and normative approaches.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
"Discipline and Punish.Foucault, Michel

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
218 ( #18,867 of 47,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #10,129 of 47,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.