Can deliberation neutralise power?

European Journal of Political Theory 17 (3):257-279 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most democratic theorists agree that concentrations of wealth and power tend to distort the functioning of democracy and ought to be countered wherever possible. Deliberative democrats are no exception: though not its only potential value, the capacity of deliberation to ‘neutralise power’ is often regarded as ‘fundamental’ to deliberative theory. Power may be neutralised, according to many deliberative democrats, if citizens can be induced to commit more fully to the deliberative resolution of common problems. If they do, they will be unable to get away with inconsistencies and bad or private reasons, thereby mitigating the illegitimate influence of power. I argue, however, that the means by which power inflects political disagreement is far more subtle than this model suggests and cannot be countered so simply. As a wealth of recent research in political psychology demonstrates, human beings persistently exhibit ‘motivated reasoning’, meaning that even when we are sincerely committed to the deliberative...
Reprint years
2015, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAGCDN-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-10-21

Total views
168 ( #15,029 of 37,198 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #16,434 of 37,198 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.