Conceivability, possibility, and the mind-body problem

Philosophical Review 108 (4):497-528 (1999)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper was chosen by The Philosopher’s Annual as one of the ten best articles appearing in print in 2000. Reprinted in Volume XXIII of The Philosopher’s Annual. In his very influential book David Chalmers argues that if physicalism is true then every positive truth is a priori entailed by the full physical description – this is called “the a priori entailment thesis – but ascriptions of phenomenal consciousness are not so entailed and he concludes that Physicalism is false. As he puts it, “zombies” are metaphysically possible. I attempt to show that this argument is refuted by considering an analogous argument in the mouth of a zombie. The conclusion of this argument is false so one of the premises is false. I argue at length that this shows that the original conceivability argument also has a false premise and so is invalid.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BALCPA
Revision history
Archival date: 2010-12-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Tracking Representationalism.Bourget, David & Mendelovici, Angela
Conceiving of Pain.O'sullivan, Brendan & Hanks, Peter

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
1,560 ( #714 of 37,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
346 ( #770 of 37,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.