Neutral Monism Reconsidered

Philosophical Psychology 23 (2):173-187 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Neutral monism is a position in metaphysics defended by Mach, James, and Russell in the early twentieth century. It holds that minds and physical objects are essentially two different orderings of the same underlying neutral elements of nature. This paper sets out some of the central concepts, theses and the historical background of ideas that inform this doctrine of elements. The discussion begins with the classic neutral monism of Mach, James, and Russell in the first part of the paper, then considers recent neo-Russellian versions in the second half. The chances for a revival of neutral monism are probably slight; its key ideas and starting points lie far from those in contemporary philosophy of mind. A better route might be through the philosophy of science and a deeper understanding of causation
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BANNMR
Revision history
First archival date: 2009-06-23
Latest version: 2 (2010-04-23)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causation, Prediction, and Search.Spirtes, Peter; Glymour, Clark & Scheines, Richard
Mental Causation.Yablo, Stephen

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-06-24

Total views
3,100 ( #281 of 39,588 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
479 ( #599 of 39,588 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.