Neutral Monism Reconsidered

Philosophical Psychology 23 (2):173-187 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Neutral monism is a position in metaphysics defended by Mach, James, and Russell in the early twentieth century. It holds that minds and physical objects are essentially two different orderings of the same underlying neutral elements of nature. This paper sets out some of the central concepts, theses and the historical background of ideas that inform this doctrine of elements. The discussion begins with the classic neutral monism of Mach, James, and Russell in the first part of the paper, then considers recent neo-Russellian versions in the second half. The chances for a revival of neutral monism are probably slight; its key ideas and starting points lie far from those in contemporary philosophy of mind. A better route might be through the philosophy of science and a deeper understanding of causation
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BANNMR
Upload history
First archival date: 2009-06-23
Latest version: 2 (2010-04-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-06-24

Total views
3,792 ( #415 of 52,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #6,286 of 52,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.