Simpson's Paradox and Causality

American Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):13-25 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There are three questions associated with Simpson’s Paradox (SP): (i) Why is SP paradoxical? (ii) What conditions generate SP?, and (iii) What should be done about SP? By developing a logic-based account of SP, it is argued that (i) and (ii) must be divorced from (iii). This account shows that (i) and (ii) have nothing to do with causality, which plays a role only in addressing (iii). A counterexample is also presented against the causal account. Finally, the causal and logic-based approaches are compared by means of an experiment to show that SP is not basically causal.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BANSPA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causality.Pearl, Judea
.Kahneman, Daniel & Frederick, Shane
Causation, Prediction, and Search.Spirtes, Peter; Glymour, Clark & Scheines, Richard

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-02-19

Total views
340 ( #10,391 of 43,936 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #14,528 of 43,936 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.