How do Somatic Markers Feature in Decision Making?

Emotion Review 7 (1):81-89 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Several recent criticisms of the somatic marker hypothesis (SMH) identify multiple ambiguities in the way it has been formulated by its chief proponents. Here we provide evidence that this hypothesis has also been interpreted in various different ways by the scientific community. Our diagnosis of this problem is that SMH lacks an adequate computational-level account of practical decision making. Such an account is necessary for drawing meaningful links between neurological- and psychological-level data. The paper concludes by providing a simple, five-step model of practical decision making. Recasting SMH in terms of this model generates more precise and empirically tractable computational-level hypotheses about the various ways that somatic markers might influence practical decisions.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BARHDS-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-04-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-04-07

Total views
552 ( #7,284 of 51,421 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #22,328 of 51,421 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.