Perceptual Justification and the Cartesian Theater

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to a traditional Cartesian epistemology of perception, perception does not provide one with direct knowledge of the external world. Instead, your immediate perceptual evidence is limited to facts about your own visual experience, from which conclusions about the external world must be inferred. Cartesianism faces well-known skeptical challenges. But this chapter argues that any anti-Cartesian view strong enough to avoid these challenges must license a way of updating one’s beliefs in response to anticipated experiences that seems diachronically irrational. To avoid this result, the anti-Cartesian must either license an unacceptable epistemic chauvinism, or else claim that merely reflecting on one’s experiences defeats perceptual justification. This leaves us with a puzzle: Although Cartesianism faces problems, avoiding them brings a new set of problems.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 61 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Evidence of Evidence as Higher Order Evidence.Eder, Anna-Maria A. & Brössel, Peter

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
276 ( #16,257 of 50,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #17,838 of 50,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.