Richness and Reflection

Philosophia Mathematica 24 (3):330-359 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A pervasive thought in contemporary philosophy of mathematics is that in order to justify reflection principles, one must hold universism: the view that there is a single universe of pure sets. I challenge this kind of reasoning by contrasting universism with a Zermelian form of multiversism. I argue that if extant justifications of reflection principles using notions of richness are acceptable for the universist, then the Zermelian can use similar justifications. However, I note that for some forms of richness argument, the status of reflection principles as axioms is left open for the Zermelian.

Author's Profile

Neil Barton
University of Oslo

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-30

Downloads
248 (#65,439)

6 months
96 (#49,673)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?