The Current Epistemic Status of the Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Science

Analele Universitatii Din Craiova 36 (2):108-132 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The predisposition of the Indispensability Argument to objections, rephrasing and versions associated with the various views in philosophy of mathematics grants it a special status of a “blueprint” type rather than a debatable theme in the philosophy of science. From this point of view, it follows that the Argument has more an epistemic character than ontological.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-22
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
144 ( #36,530 of 2,445,937 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #11,511 of 2,445,937 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.