Heraclitus against the Naïve Paratactic Metaphysics of Mere Things

Ancient Philosophy Today 3 (1):74-97 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers an interpretative model for the study of Heraclitus, which was first put forward by Alexander Mourelatos in 1973, and draws upon a related model put forward by Julius Moravcsik beginning in 1983. I further develop this combined model and provide a motivation for an interpretation of Heraclitus. This is also of interest for modern metaphysics due to the recurrence of structurally similar problems, including the ‘colour exclusion’ problem that was faced by Wittgenstein. Further, I employ the model to shed new light on Heraclitus’ image of the river, while relating potential readings to various contemporary metaphysical views.

Author's Profile

Keith Begley
Durham University

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-07

Downloads
885 (#22,539)

6 months
187 (#15,379)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?