Is there a defensible conception of reflective equilibrium?

Synthese 203 (3):1-26 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to re-assess reflective equilibrium (“RE”). We ask whether there is a conception of RE that can be defended against the various objections that have been raised against RE in the literature. To answer this question, we provide a systematic overview of the main objections, and for each objection, we investigate why it looks plausible, on what standard or expectation it is based, how it can be answered and which features RE must have to meet the objection. We find that there is a conception of RE that promises to withstand all objections. However, this conception has some features that may be unexpected: it aims at a justification that is tailored to understanding and it is neither tied to intuitions nor does it imply coherentism. We conclude by pointing out a cluster of questions we think RE theorists should pay more attention to.

Author Profiles

Claus Beisbart
University of Bern
Georg Brun
University of Bern

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-22

Downloads
153 (#88,726)

6 months
118 (#51,087)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?