Nature and the Good: An exploration of ancient ethical naturalism in Cicero’s De finibus

Pensamiento y Cultura 14 (2):145-163 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper investigates the differences between ancient Greek and modern ethical naturalism, through the account of the whole classical tradition provided by Cicero in De finibus bonorum et malorum. Ever since Hume’s remarks on the topic, it is usually held that derivations of normative claims from factual claims require some kind of proper justification. It ́s a the presence of such justifications in the Epicurean, Stoic, and Academic-Peripatetic ethical theories (as portrayed in De finibus), and, after a negative conclusion, I argue that we should conceive of this issue within a social-historical perspective: The radical difference between ancient and modern naturalistic ethics is due (in Weber’s terms) to the rationalization processes that generated the modern outlook on nature.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-08-27
Latest version: 1 (2017-05-03)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
145 ( #22,327 of 43,787 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #11,711 of 43,787 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.