Non-Normal Worlds and Representation

In Michal Peliš & Vít Punčochář (eds.), The Logica Yearbook. College Publications (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
World semantics for relevant logics include so-called non-normal or impossible worlds providing model-theoretic counterexamples to such irrelevant entailments as (A ∧ ¬A) → B, A → (B∨¬B), or A → (B → B). Some well-known views interpret non-normal worlds as information states. If so, they can plausibly model our ability of conceiving or representing logical impossibilities. The phenomenon is explored by combining a formal setting with philosophical discussion. I take Priest’s basic relevant logic N4 and extend it, on the syntactic side, with a representation operator, (R), and on the semantic side, with particularly anarchic non-normal worlds. This combination easily invalidates unwelcome “logical omniscience” in- ferences of standard epistemic logic, such as belief-consistency and closure under entailment. Some open questions are then raised on the best strategies to regiment (R) in order to express more vertebrate kinds of conceivability.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-05-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth in Fiction.Lewis, David K.
The Semantics of Entailment.Routley, Richard & Meyer, Robert K.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
327 ( #13,382 of 49,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #41,127 of 49,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.