Others matter. The failure of the autonomous approach to ethics

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The critical target of my paper is the normativist stance of Kantian meta ethics. After a very short introduction, I develop a characterization of contemporary mainstream Kantism as a conjunction of a normativist claim, a rationalist claim and a proceduralist claim. In the subsequent section I make the case against the normativist claim by drawing a counterexample, and defend the relevance of such counterexample as a reason that defeats the appeal of the Kantian approach to meta ethics. I finally conclude by highlighting the main reasons why the challenge my counterexample rises are not answerable within a Kantian framework.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine M.
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine M.
P.Kant, Immanuel

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #35,701 of 48,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #23,262 of 48,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.