just design

Design Studies 54:1-22 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Inclusive design prescribes addressing the needs of the widest possible audience in order to consider human differences. Taking differences seriously, however, may imply severely restricting “the widest possible audience”. In confronting this paradox, we investigate to what extent Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness applies to design. By converting the paradox into the question of how design can be fair, we show that the demand for equitability shifts from the design output to the design process. We conclude that the two main questions about justice find application in design: the question about the standards of justice and the question about its metrics. We endorse a Rawlsian approach to the former, while some revision may be due regarding the latter.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BIAJD
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Natural History of Human Morality.Tomasello, Michael (ed.)

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-08

Total views
50 ( #33,765 of 42,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #22,043 of 42,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.