The Methods of Normativity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay is an examination of the relationship between phenomenology and analytic method in the philosophy of law. It proceeds by way of a case study, the requirement of compliance in Raz’s theory of mandatory norms. Proceeding in this way provides a degree of specificity that is otherwise neglected in the relevant literature on method. Drawing on insights from the philosophy of art and cognitive neuroscience, it is argued that the requirement of compliance is beset by a range of epistemological difficulties. The implications of these difficulties are then reviewed for method and normativity in practical reason. A topology of normativity emerges nearer the end of the paper, followed by a brief examination of how certain normative categories must satisfy distinct burdens of proof.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BINTMO-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-02-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-02-15

Total views
160 ( #37,248 of 65,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #36,648 of 65,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.