Is a vegetarian diet morally safe?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
If non-human animals have high moral status, then we commit a grave moral error by eating them. Eating animals is thus morally risky, while many agree that it is morally permissible to not eat animals. According to some philosophers, then, non-animal ethicists should err on the side of caution and refrain from eating animals. I argue that this precautionary argument assumes a false dichotomy of dietary options: a diet that includes farm-raised animals or a diet that does not include animals of any kind. There is a third dietary option, namely, a diet of plants and non-traditional animal protein, and there is evidence that such a diet results in the least amount of harm to animals. It follows therefore that moral uncertainty does not support the adoption of a vegetarian diet.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOBIAV
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-06-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-06-16

Total views
117 ( #47,862 of 70,083 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
117 ( #5,887 of 70,083 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.