Epistemic Judgement and Motivation

Philosophical Quarterly 70 (281):738-758 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is there an epistemic analogue of moral motivational internalism? The answer to this question has implications for our understanding of the nature of epistemic normativity. For example, some philosophers have argued from claims that epistemic judgement is not necessarily motivating to the view that epistemic judgement is not normative. This paper examines the options for spelling out an epistemic analogue of moral motivational internalism. It is argued that the most promising approach connects epistemic judgements to doxastic dispositions, which are related to motivation in a fairly tenuous sense. It is also argued that this approach currently lacks a plausible and informative account of the nature and workings of these doxastic dispositions, and, hence, an explanation of the range of phenomena internalist theses typically set out to explain. The most promising route for developing such an account, based on recent expressivist work, is investigated and found inadequate for the task.

Author Profiles

Cameron Boult
Brandon University
Sebastian Köhler
Frankfurt School of Finance & Management

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
282 (#29,706)

6 months
68 (#11,572)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?