Developing a Model of Groupstrapping: A Response to Baumgaertner and Nguyen

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In their responses to my article “Epistemically Pernicious Groups and the Groupstrapping Problem” (Boyd, 2018), Bert Baumgaertner (“Groupstrapping, Boostrapping, and Oops-strapping: A Reply to Boyd”) and C. Thi Nguyen (“Group-strapping, Bubble, or Echo Chamber?”) have raised interesting questions and opened lines of inquiry regarding my discussion of what I hope to be a way to help make sense of how members of groups can continue to hold beliefs that are greatly outweighed by countervailing evidence (e.g. antivaxxers, climate-change deniers, etc.). Here I respond to these arguments and suggestions by providing three new reasons to believe that groupstrapping as I describe it occurs in epistemically pernicious groups.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOYDAM
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-08-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-08-15

Total views
62 ( #40,258 of 51,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #29,626 of 51,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.