Mental imagery and the varieties of amodal perception

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):153-173 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The problem of amodal perception is the problem of how we represent features of perceived objects that are occluded or otherwise hidden from us. Bence Nanay (2010) has recently proposed that we amodally perceive an object's occluded features by imaginatively projecting them into the relevant regions of visual egocentric space. In this paper, I argue that amodal perception is not a single, unitary capacity. Drawing appropriate distinctions reveals amodal perception to be characterized not only by mental imagery, as Nanay suggests, but also by genuinely visual representations as well as beliefs. I conclude with some brief remarks on the role of object-directed bodily action in conferring a sense of unseen presence on an object's occluded features
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRIMIA
Revision history
First archival date: 2011-01-02
Latest version: 2 (2014-08-25)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Cognition in the Wild.Hutchins, Edwin

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Visual Feeling of Presence.Ferretti, Gabriele

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-01-02

Total views
1,597 ( #1,506 of 50,404 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
100 ( #4,878 of 50,404 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.