False Idles: The Politics of the "Quiet Life"

In Ryan Balot (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Oxford, UK: pp. 485-500 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The dominant Greek and Roman ideology held that the best human life required engaging in politics, on the grounds that the human good is shared, not private, and that the activities central to this shared good are those of traditional politics. This chapter surveys three ways in which philosophers challenged this ideology, defended a withdrawal from or transformation of traditional politics, and thus rethought what politics could be. Plato and Aristotle accept the ideology's two central commitments but insist that a few exceptional human beings could transcend the good of human activities. Epicurus argues that the human good is private, not shared. Socrates and some of his followers, including especially the Stoics, argue that the activities central to the shared human good are not those of traditional politics.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BROFIT-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-09-18

Total views
234 ( #25,489 of 2,439,691 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #17,132 of 2,439,691 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.