Why Can’t There Be Numbers?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Platonists affirm the existence of abstract mathematical objects, and Nominalists deny the existence of abstract mathematical objects. While there are standard arguments in favor of Nominalism, these arguments fail to account for the necessity of Nominalism. Furthermore, these arguments do nothing to explain why Nominalism is true. They only point to certain theoretical vices that might befall the Platonist. The goal of this paper is to formulate and defend a simple, valid argument for the necessity of Nominalism that seeks to precisify the widespread intuition that mathematical objects are somehow ‘spooky’ or ‘mysterious’.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-03-03
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
623 ( #9,541 of 2,454,491 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
270 ( #1,587 of 2,454,491 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.