Self-Consciousness and Reductive Functionalism

Philosophical Quarterly 67 (266):1-21 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is argued that although George Bealer's influential ‘Self-Consciousness argument’ refutes standard versions of reductive functionalism (RF), it fails to generalize in the way Bealer supposes. To wit, he presupposes that any version of RF must take the content of ‘pain’ to be the property of being in pain (and so on), which is expressly rejected in independently motivated versions of conceptual role semantics (CRS). Accordingly, there are independently motivated versions of RF, incorporating CRS, which avoid Bealer's main type of refutation. I focus particularly on one such theory, which takes concepts to be event types that are individuated by their psychological roles, which has the resources of responding to each of the more specific worries Bealer expresses.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BVESAR-6
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-01-16
Latest version: 2 (2017-01-26)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is Meaning.Soames, Scott
A Study of Concepts.PEACOCKE, Christopher
New Thinking About Propositions.King, Jeffrey C.; Soames, Scott & Speaks, Jeff

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-16

Total views
210 ( #14,808 of 40,753 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #17,793 of 40,753 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.