The Eightfold Way: Why Analyticity, Apriority and Necessity are Independent

Philosophers' Imprint 17:1-17 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper concerns the three great modal dichotomies: (i) the necessary/contingent dichotomy; (ii) the a priori/empirical dichotomy; and (iii) the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. These can be combined to produce a tri-dichotomy of eight modal categories. The question as to which of the eight categories house statements and which do not is a pivotal battleground in the history of analytic philosophy, with key protagonists including Descartes, Hume, Kant, Kripke, Putnam and Kaplan. All parties to the debate have accepted that some categories are void. This paper defends the contrary view that all eight categories house statements—a position I dub ‘octopropositionalism’. Examples of statements belonging to all eight categories are given.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-12-01
Latest version: 3 (2017-12-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
281 ( #18,100 of 54,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #19,549 of 54,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.