The Eightfold Way: Why Analyticity, Apriority and Necessity are Independent

Philosophers' Imprint 17:1-17 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper concerns the three great modal dichotomies: (i) the necessary/contingent dichotomy; (ii) the a priori/empirical dichotomy; and (iii) the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. These can be combined to produce a tri-dichotomy of eight modal categories. The question as to which of the eight categories house statements and which do not is a pivotal battleground in the history of analytic philosophy, with key protagonists including Descartes, Hume, Kant, Kripke, Putnam and Kaplan. All parties to the debate have accepted that some categories are void. This paper defends the contrary view that all eight categories house statements—a position I dub ‘octopropositionalism’. Examples of statements belonging to all eight categories are given.
Keywords
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CAMTEW
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-12-01
Latest version: 3 (2017-12-23)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-01

Total downloads
120 ( #15,701 of 32,663 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #6,010 of 32,663 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.