(Anti)-Anti-Intellectualism and the Sufficiency Thesis

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):374-397 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Anti-intellectualists about knowledge-how insist that, when an agent S knows how to φ, it is in virtue of some ability, rather than in virtue of any propositional attitudes, S has. Recently, a popular strategy for attacking the anti-intellectualist position proceeds by appealing to cases where an agent is claimed to possess a reliable ability to φ while nonetheless intuitively lacking knowledge-how to φ. John Bengson & Marc Moffett (2009; 2011a; 2011b) and Carlotta Pavese (2015a; 2015b) have embraced precisely this strategy and have thus claimed, for different reasons, that anti-intellectualism is defective on the grounds that possessing the ability to φ is not sufficient for knowing how to φ. We investigate this strategy of argument-by-counterexample to the anti- intellectualist’s sufficiency thesis and show that, at the end of the day, anti-intellectualism remains unscathed.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARAAT-29
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-10-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowing How.Willlamson, Timothy
Knowledge‐How and Epistemic Luck.Carter, J. Adam & Pritchard, Duncan

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-15

Total downloads
402 ( #5,841 of 37,187 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
161 ( #1,802 of 37,187 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.