CONCRETE ENTITIES AND NON-CONCRETE ENTITIES IN COGNITION

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Seems plausible to accept the thesis that “it is not objects per se that have a special status in the mind of the child”. I grasp this thesis in the sense that the only stuff that infants can individuate are not objects, but this not implies that objects do not make the core contribution to our (adult) metaphysical conceptual scheme, i.e. to constitute a platform for basic adaptive environmental performances in adult life. Plausibly, any young human cognitive system needs to stabilize capacities to track holes and shadows since these non concrete entities could be indispensable in a world perceived as populated with objects.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARCEA
Upload history
Archival date: 2009-03-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-03-20

Total views
221 ( #21,272 of 52,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #39,934 of 52,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.