Knowledge, Assertion and Intellectual Humility

Logos and Episteme 7 (4):489-502 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper has two central aims. First, we motivate a puzzle. The puzzle features four independently plausible but jointly inconsistent claims. One of the four claims is the sufficiency leg of the knowledge norm of assertion (KNA-S), according to which one is properly epistemically positioned to assert that p if one knows that p. Second, we propose that rejecting (KNA-S) is the best way out of the puzzle. Our argument to this end appeals to the epistemic value of intellectual humility in social-epistemic practice.
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARKAA-6
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-08

Total views
239 ( #18,967 of 51,654 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #27,845 of 51,654 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.