Overcoming Intellectualism about Knowledge and Understanding: A Unified Approach

Logos and Episteme 9 (1):7-26 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I defend a unified approach to knowledge and understanding. Both are achievements due to cognitive abilities or skills. The difference between them is a difference of aspects. Knowledge emphasizes the successful aspect of an achievement and the exclusion of epistemic luck, whereas understanding emphasizes the agent's contribution in bringing about an achievement through the exercise of one's cognitive skills. Knowledge and understanding cannot be separated. I argue against the claim that understanding is distinct from knowledge because the former is compatible with environmental luck. Achievements rule out environmental luck because abilities can be exercised only in their proper environment. I also reject the intellectualist claim that understanding requires the ability to explain what one intends to understand. The understanding of an item is reflected in our ability to solve cognitive tasks using that item. The more tasks one can deal with by using an item, the deeper is one’s understanding of that item. Being able to explain why a claim holds is not necessary for possessing understanding, even though it may be necessary for accomplishing some very specific tasks. Neither understanding nor knowledge require any kind of second-order cognition by default.
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CAROIA-5
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-01-03
Latest version: 3 (2020-02-17)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-04-04

Total views
181 ( #27,687 of 56,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #29,273 of 56,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.