Shame and Attributability

In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, vol. 6 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Responsibility as accountability is normally taken to have stricter control conditions than responsibility as attributability. A common way to argue for this claim is to point to differences in the harmfulness of blame involved in these different kinds of responsibility. This paper argues that this explanation does not work once we shift our focus from other-directed blame to self-blame. To blame oneself in the accountability sense is to feel guilt and feeling guilty is to suffer. To blame oneself in the attributability sense, it will be argued, is to feel shame and feeling shame is also to suffer. The different control conditions cannot be explained by a difference in the harm of blame. Instead, this paper argues that accountability and attributability are governed by different kinds of appropriateness: an agent S is accountability blameworthy for X only if S deserves to feel guilty; an agent S is attributability blameworthy for X only if it is fitting that S feels shame for X.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARSAA-21
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Fittingness First.McHugh, Conor & Way, Jonathan

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-06

Total views
98 ( #24,173 of 39,922 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
98 ( #4,211 of 39,922 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.