Sosa versus Kornblith on Grades of Knowledge

Synthese (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a series of works Ernest Sosa (see Sosa 1991, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2015, 2017) has defended the view that there are two kinds or ‘grades’ of knowledge, animal and reflective. One of the most persistent critics of Sosa’s attempts to bifurcate knowledge is Hilary Kornblith (see Kornblith 2004, 2009, 2012). Our aim in this paper is to outline and evaluate Kornblith’s criticisms. We will argue that, while they raise a range of difficult (exegetical and substantive) questions about Sosa’s ‘bi-level’ epistemology, Sosa has the resources to adequately respond to all of them. Thus, this paper is a (qualified) defence of Sosa’s bi-level epistemology.
Keywords
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARSVK
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-01-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowing Full Well.Sosa, Ernest
What is Justified Belief.Goldman, Alvin I.

View all 57 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-08

Total views
152 ( #19,697 of 41,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #22,216 of 41,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.