Would SNOMED CT benefit from realism-based ontology evolution?

AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2007:105-109 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If SNOMED CT is to serve as a biomedical reference terminology, then steps must be taken to ensure comparability of information formulated using successive versions. New releases are therefore shipped with a history mechanism. We assessed the adequacy of this mechanism for its treatment of the distinction between changes occurring on the side of entities in reality and changes in our understanding thereof. We found that these two types are only partially distinguished and that a more detailed study is required to propose clear recommendations for enhancement along at least the following lines: (1) explicit representation of the provenance of a class; (2) separation of the time-period during which a component is stated valid in SNOMED CT from the period it is (or has been) valid in reality, and (3) redesign of the historical relationships table to give users better assistance for recovery in case of introduced mistakes.

Author's Profile

Barry Smith
State University of New York, Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-22

Downloads
109 (#56,468)

6 months
15 (#59,124)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?