DRUG FACTS, VALUES, AND THE MORNING-AFTER PILL

Public Affairs Quarterly 35 (1):51-82 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the Value-Free Ideal of science has suffered compelling criticism, some advocates like Gregor Betz continue to argue that science policy advisors should avoid value judgments by hedging their hypotheses. This approach depends on a mistaken understanding of the relations between facts and values in regulatory science. My case study involves the morning-after pill Plan B and the “Drug Fact” that it “may” prevent implantation. I analyze the operative values, which I call zygote-centrism, responsible for this hedged drug label. Then, I explain my twofold account of value-ladenness, involving the constitutive role of value judgments in science and the social function of facts as political tools. Because this drug fact is ineliminably value-laden in both senses, I conclude that hedged hypotheses are not necessarily value-free.

Author's Profile

Christopher ChoGlueck
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-30

Downloads
1,306 (#11,315)

6 months
378 (#3,518)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?