Russell and the Temporal Contiguity of Causes and Effects

Erkenntnis 83 (6):1245-1264 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There are some necessary conditions on causal relations that seem to be so trivial that they do not merit further inquiry. Many philosophers assume that the requirement that there could be no temporal gaps between causes and their effects is such a condition. Bertrand Russell disagrees. In this paper, an in-depth discussion of Russell’s argument against this necessary condition is the centerpiece of an analysis of what is at stake when one accepts or denies that there can be temporal gaps between causes and effects. It is argued that whether one accepts or denies this condition, one is implicated in taking on substantial and wide-ranging philosophical positions. Therefore, it is not a trivial necessary condition of causal relations and it merits further inquiry.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-06-01
Latest version: 2 (2018-10-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causation: A User’s Guide.Paul, L. A. & Hall, Ned
Causation.Lewis, David

View all 54 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
145 ( #23,869 of 45,262 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #20,404 of 45,262 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.