Counterfactuals of divine freedom

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):185-205 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contrary to the commonly held position of Luis de Molina, Thomas Flint and others, I argue that counterfactuals of divine freedom are pre-volitional for God within the Molinist framework. That is, CDFs are not true even partly in virtue of some act of God’s will. As a result, I argue that the Molinist God fails to satisfy an epistemic openness requirement for rational deliberation, and thus she cannot rationally deliberate about which world to actualize.

Author's Profile

Yishai Cohen
University of Southern Maine

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-22

Downloads
839 (#16,184)

6 months
143 (#22,364)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?