No lacuna and no vicious regress: A reply to le poidevin

Acta Analytica 23 (4):367-372 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his “Space, supervenience and substantivalism”, Le Poidevin proposes a substantivalism in which space is discrete, implying that there are unmediated spatial relations between neighboring primitive points. This proposition is motivated by his concern that relationism suffers from an explanatory lacuna and that substantivalism gives rise to a vicious regress. Le Poidevin implicitly requires that the relationist be committed to the “only x and y ” principle regarding spatial relations. It is not obvious that the relationist is committed to this principle in such a context. An additional motivation for Le Poidevin's argument, that space should be considered to be discrete, is that he believes that substantivalists are committed to a vicious regress. I show that the regress is in fact not of the vicious variety. These two main arguments show that Le Poidevin's suggestion that we drop the density postulate for space is unnecessary.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CONNLA
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-10-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
356 ( #14,875 of 56,044 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #28,495 of 56,044 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.