Transcendence in Postmetaphysical Thinking. Habermas' God

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Habermas emphasizes the importance for critical thinking of ideas of truth and moral validity that are at once context-transcending and immanent to human practices. in a recent review, Peter Dews queries his distinction between metaphysically construed transcendence and transcendence from within, asking provocatively in what sense Habermas does not believe in God. I answer that his conception of “God” is resolutely postmetaphysical, a god that is constructed by way of human linguistic practices. I then give three reasons for why it should not be embraced by contemporary critical social theory. First, in the domain of practical reason, this conception of transcendence excludes by fiat any “Other” to communicative reason, blocking possibilities for mutual learning. Second, due to the same exclusion, it risks reproducing an undesirable social order. Third, it is inadequate for the purposes of a critical theory of social institutions.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COOTIP-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-12-21

Total views
27 ( #44,216 of 46,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #28,474 of 46,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.