The Euclidean Mousetrap: Schopenhauer’s Criticism of the Synthetic Method in Geometry

Idealistic Studies 38 (3):209-220 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his doctoral dissertation On the Principle of Sufficient Reason, Arthur Schopenhauer there outlines a critique of Euclidean geometry on the basis of the changing nature of mathematics, and hence of demonstration, as a result of Kantian idealism. According to Schopenhauer, Euclid treats geometry synthetically, proceeding from the simple to the complex, from the known to the unknown, “synthesizing” later proofs on the basis of earlier ones. Such a method, although proving the case logically, nevertheless fails to attain the raison d’être of the entity. In order to obtain this, a separate method is required, which Schopenhauer refers to as “analysis,” thus echoing a method already in practice among the early Greek geometers, with however some significant differences. In this essay, I here discuss Schopenhauer’s criticism of synthesis in Euclid’s Elements, and the nature and relevance of his own method of analysis.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2009
ISBN(s)
0046-8541
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COSTEM-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-06-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
492 ( #8,926 of 52,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #9,846 of 52,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.