Atemporalism and dependence

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is widely thought that Atemporalism—the view that, because God is “outside” of time, he does not foreknow anything —constitutes a unique solution to the problem of freedom and foreknowledge. However, as I argue here, in order for Atemporalism to escape certain worries, the view must appeal to the dependence of God’s timeless knowledge on our actions. I then argue that, because it must appeal to such dependence, Atemporalism is crucially similar to the recent sempiternalist accounts proposed by Trenton Merricks, Philip Swenson, and Jonathan Westphal, and I conclude by briefly sketching some implications of this result.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-02-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Freedom.Merricks, Trenton
Eternity.Stump, Eleonore & Kretzmann, Norman

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
119 ( #30,502 of 50,386 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
119 ( #3,925 of 50,386 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.