Epistemic Uniqueness and the Practical Relevance of Epistemic Practices

Philosophia 45 (4):1721-1733 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
By taking the practical relevance of coordinated epistemic standards into account, Dogramaci and Horowitz (2016) as well as Greco and Hedden (2016) offer a new perspective on epistemic permissiveness. However, in its current state, their argument appears to be inconclusive. I will offer two reasons why this argument does not support interpersonal uniqueness in general. First, such an argument leaves open the possibility that distinct closed societies come to incompatible epistemic standards. Second, some epistemic practices like the promotion of methodological heterogeneity in epistemic communities could be best explained by epistemic permissiveness.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Uniqueness and Metaepistemology.Greco, Daniel & Hedden, Brian
An Argument for Uniqueness About Evidential Support.Dogramaci, Sinan & Horowitz, Sophie
The Uniqueness Thesis.Kopec, Matthew & Titelbaum, Michael

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
115 ( #21,589 of 39,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #12,152 of 39,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.