Reasons to Respond to AI Emotional Expressions

American Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human emotional expressions can communicate the emotional state of the expresser, but they can also communicate appeals to perceivers. For example, sadness expressions such as crying request perceivers to aid and support, and anger expressions such as shouting urge perceivers to back off. Some contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) systems can mimic human emotional expressions in a (more or less) realistic way, and they are progressively being integrated into our daily lives. How should we respond to them? Do we have reasons to reply to the appeals made by AI emotional expressions? In this paper, we examine the conditions under which AI emotional expressions could give us prudential or even moral reasons to change our behavior. We argue that these conditions do not depend on whether the emotional expression is genuine or not, but rather on the presence of features some of which can be implemented in emotive AI given our current level of technological development. We extract recommendations and warnings for the development of emotive AI.

Author Profiles

Rodrigo Díaz
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)
Jonas Blatter
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-07

Downloads
147 (#79,062)

6 months
147 (#22,266)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?