Stereotypes, Conceptual Centrality and Gender Bias: An Empirical Investigation

Ratio 30 (4):384-410 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Discussions in social psychology overlook an important way in which biases can be encoded in conceptual representations. Most accounts of implicit bias focus on ‘mere associations’ between features and representations of social groups. While some have argued that some implicit biases must have a richer conceptual structure, they have said little about what this richer structure might be. To address this lacuna, we build on research in philosophy and cognitive science demonstrating that concepts represent dependency relations between features. These relations, in turn, determine the centrality of a feature f for a concept C: roughly, the more features of C depend on f, the more central f is for C. In this paper, we argue that the dependency networks that link features can encode significant biases. To support this claim, we present a series of studies that show how a particular brilliance-gender bias is encoded in the dependency networks which are part of the concepts of female and male academics. We also argue that biases which are encoded in dependency networks have unique implications for social cognition.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DELSCC
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-09-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-06-13

Total views
64 ( #53,030 of 64,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #52,263 of 64,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.