Valuing humane lives in two-level utilitarianism

Utilitas 32 (3):276-293 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I examine the two-level utilitarian case for humane animal agriculture (by R. M. Hare and Gary Varner) and argue that it fails on its own terms. The case states that, at the ‘intuitive level’ of moral thinking, we can justify raising and killing animals for food, regarding them as replaceable, while treating them with respect. I show that two-level utilitarianism supports, instead, alternatives to animal agriculture. First, the case for humane animal agriculture does not follow from a commitment to two-level utilitarianism combined with a commitment to respecting animal lives. Secondly, the two-level utilitarian case falls prey to a compartmentalization problem and cannot uphold both respect and replaceability. What I call ‘humane lives’ are not appropriately valued by the lights of two-level utilitarianism itself.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-11-18
Latest version: 2 (2020-02-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
236 ( #24,178 of 59,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #12,301 of 59,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.